On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:23:00PM +0530, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> On 12-Aug-21 9:31 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:41:07PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> > > drm_dp_dpcd_read/write already has debug error message.
> > > Drop redundant error messages which gives false
> > > status even if correct value is read in drm_dp_dpcd_read().
> > >
> > > v2: -Added fixes tag (Ankit)
> > > v3: -Fixed build error (CI)
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9488a030ac91 ("drm/i915: Add support for enabling link status and recovery")
> > > Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> (v2)
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "Ville Syrj_l_" <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: "Jos_ Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.12+
> > >
> > > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201218103723.30844-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 9 ++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > index c386ef8eb200..2526c9c8c690 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -3864,23 +3864,18 @@ static void intel_dp_check_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > static void intel_dp_check_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > u8 val;
> > > if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x11)
> > > return;
> > > if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > - DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val) {
> > > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in reading link service irq vector\n");
> >
> > The only problem seems to be that for !val the debug print is incorrect,
> > so maybe just have a separate check for that after this one for the read()
> > and return w/o the debug message?
> >
> > Is it really a stable material, since the change wouldn't have any
> > effect for regular users?
>
> W/o this change in case of valid short pulse this error message will
> come even if it doesn't have anything to do with link service irq. For
> ex: in case of hdcp we keep getting unnecessary error message because
> the value read is 0 which will always be the case unless its really a
> link failure between PCON and HDMI2.1 sink.
Yes, that's why I suggested to return for the '0 value read' case
without any message printed, but still keep the message for the case
when the drm_dp_dpcd_readb() fails.
Note that it's not an error message but a debug message.
> Also, code is written in accordance with other IRQ func() above like
> intel_dp_check_device_service_irq().
Ok, it's good to keep them in sync at least, so I'm ok with removing the
debug messages from here too.
> > > + DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1 || !val)
> > > return;
> > > - }
> > > if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> > > - DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1) {
> > > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Error in writing link service irq vector\n");
> > > + DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1)
> > > return;
> > > - }
> > > if (val & HDMI_LINK_STATUS_CHANGED)
> > > intel_dp_handle_hdmi_link_status_change(intel_dp);
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
> --
> ~Swati Sharma
