On 13/08/2021 18:56, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 06:41:53PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
On 13/08/2021 18:39, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/8/13 下午6:30, Anand Jain wrote:
On 13/08/2021 18:26, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2021/8/13 下午5:55, Anand Jain wrote:
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
commit c53e9653605dbf708f5be02902de51831be4b009 upstream
This lacks certain upstream fixes for it:
f9baa501b4fd6962257853d46ddffbc21f27e344 btrfs: fix deadlock when
cloning inline extents and using qgroups
4d14c5cde5c268a2bc26addecf09489cb953ef64 btrfs: don't flush from
btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata
6f23277a49e68f8a9355385c846939ad0b1261e7 btrfs: qgroup: don't commit
transaction when we already hold the handle
All these fixes are to ensure we don't try to flush in context where we
shouldn't.
Without them, it can hit various deadlock.
Qu,
Thanks for taking a look. I will send it in v2.
I guess you only need to add the missing fixes?
Yeah, maybe it's better to send it as a new set.
So should I drop the existing patches and wait for a whole new series,
or will you send these as an additional set?
Greg, I am sending it as an additional set.
And at least one of the above commits needs to go to the 5.10.y tree, I
did not check them all...
I need to look into it.
Thanks, Anand
thanks,
greg k-h
