On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:28:43AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > From: Jonathan Gray <jsg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > The backport of c9d9fdbc108af8915d3f497bbdf3898bf8f321b8 to 5.10 in > > 6976f3cf34a1a8b791c048bbaa411ebfe48666b1 removed more than it should > > have leading to 'batch' being used uninitialised. The 5.13 backport and > > the mainline commit did not remove the portion this patch adds back. > > This patch has no upstream equivalent, right? > > Which is okay -- it explains it in plain english, but it shows that > scripts should not simply search for anything that looks like SHA and > treat it as upsteam commit it. Sounds like you have a broken script if you do it that way. good luck! greg k-h
