On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 06:00:04PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 08:06:22AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 08:39:23AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 08:14:28PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > > I'm confused. I've sent a version that applied cleanly to 5.10.49: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YOr4DMQITU8yzBNT@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > and I've got an email that it was added to the stable tree and the email > > > with the patch for stable preview: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210715182623.942552790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Was anything wrong with the patch? > > > > Yes, it broke the build on ia64 due to duplicated function names :( > > The version below takes care of compatibility with ia64 in the least > intrusive way I could think of. Thanks, will go queue this up now. greg k-h
