From: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 35d7b72a632bc7afb15356f44005554af8697904 ]
In two different instances the return value of "irq_get_irq_data"
API was neither captured nor checked.
Fixed it by capturing the return value and then checking for any error.
Addresses-Coverity: "returned_null"
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
index fb8684d70fe3..c288a7502de2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c
@@ -736,6 +736,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused zynq_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct zynq_gpio *gpio = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(gpio->irq);
+ if (!data) {
+ dev_err(dev, "irq_get_irq_data() failed\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
disable_irq(gpio->irq);
@@ -753,6 +758,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused zynq_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(gpio->irq);
int ret;
+ if (!data) {
+ dev_err(dev, "irq_get_irq_data() failed\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
enable_irq(gpio->irq);
--
2.30.2
