[PATCH 5.12 030/292] io_uring: put link timeout req consistently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>

commit df9727affa058f4f18e388b30247650f8ae13cd8 upstream.

Don't put linked timeout req in io_async_find_and_cancel() but do it in
io_link_timeout_fn(), so we have only one point for that and won't have
to do it differently as it's now (put vs put_deferred). Btw, improve a
bit io_async_find_and_cancel()'s locking.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d75b70957f245275ab7cba83e0ac9c1b86aae78a.1617287883.git.asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/io_uring.c |   10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -5727,12 +5727,9 @@ static void io_async_find_and_cancel(str
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = io_async_cancel_one(req->task->io_uring, sqe_addr, ctx);
-	if (ret != -ENOENT) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
-		goto done;
-	}
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->completion_lock, flags);
+	if (ret != -ENOENT)
+		goto done;
 	ret = io_timeout_cancel(ctx, sqe_addr);
 	if (ret != -ENOENT)
 		goto done;
@@ -5747,7 +5744,6 @@ done:
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
-	io_put_req(req);
 }
 
 static int io_async_cancel_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
@@ -6310,8 +6306,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart io_link_time
 		io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	} else {
 		io_req_complete_post(req, -ETIME, 0);
-		io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	}
+	io_put_req_deferred(req, 1);
 	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
 }
 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux