On 06/06/2014 04:02 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 06:56:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 12:47:07PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> On 06/04/2014 07:48 AM, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:11:22PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>>> Hey Greg >>>>> >>>>> This email is in regards to backporting two patches to stable that >>>>> fall under the 'performance' rule: >>>>> >>>>> bfe11d6de1c416cea4f3f0f35f864162063ce3fa >>>>> fbe363c476afe8ec992d3baf682670a4bd1b6ce6 >>>> >>>> Now queued up, thanks. >>> >>> AFAIU, they introduce a performance regression. >> >> That "regression" is also in mainline, right? As Konrad doesn't seem to >> think it matters, I'm deferring to the maintainer here. > > Hehe. > > Greg is correct - the performance regression with tmpfs/ramfs does exist > upstream and once a fix has been established will be dealt with. Right now we > are fousing on the 99% usage models which is solid state, rotational, > and flash (just got one of those) and the two patches outlined above are > needed for the stable trees. Ok, I wanted to be sure before I take these to 3.12. Thanks. -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html