[AMD Official Use Only] > -----Original Message----- > From: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 1:28 AM > To: Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx> > Cc: lyude@xxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale" failed to apply to 5.13-stable tree > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 03:07:19PM +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote: > > [AMD Official Use Only] > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > Really thanks for your time. About failing to apply below patches to stable tree: > > 3769e4c0af5b82c8ea21d037013cb9564dfaa51f > > [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by ports in stale > > topology > > > > 35d3e8cb35e75450f87f87e3d314e2d418b6954b > > [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Do not set proposed vcpi directly > > > > There was an immediate following patch to correct the issue caused by above patches: > > 24ff3dc18b99c4b912ab1746e803ddb3be5ced4c > > [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently added call > > to drm_dbg_kms() > > > > In other words, these three patches should be committed at the same time. Sorry for any inconvenience it brought. > > Please advise me if there is anything else to do for having these patches applied to stable tree. > > Really thanks for your help. > > These commits do not apply to the current stable trees, so please submit backports of them for how ever far back you wish to see > them, so that we can apply them. Hi Greg, I see. Thanks for your time! Will do. Regards, Wayne > > thanks, > > greg k-h
