From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 307e5042c7bdae15308ef2e9b848833b84122eb0 upstream.
Commit 91c960b0056672 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other
atomics in .imm") converted BPF_XADD to BPF_ATOMIC and updated all JIT
implementations to reject JIT'ing instructions with an immediate value
different from BPF_ADD. However, ppc32 BPF JIT was implemented around
the same time and didn't include the same change. Update the ppc32 JIT
accordingly.
Fixes: 51c66ad849a7 ("powerpc/bpf: Implement extended BPF on PPC32")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.13+
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/426699046d89fe50f66ecf74bd31c01eda976ba5.1625145429.git.naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -773,9 +773,17 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *
break;
/*
- * BPF_STX XADD (atomic_add)
+ * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
*/
- case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W: /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
+ if (imm != BPF_ADD) {
+ pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
+ code, i);
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ /* *(u32 *)(dst + off) += src */
+
bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg);
/* Get offset into TMP_REG */
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp_reg, off));
@@ -789,7 +797,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *
PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx - 3) * 4);
break;
- case BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */
+ case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: /* *(u64 *)(dst + off) += src */
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/*
