On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:36:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit e0cdd26af8eb9001689a4cde4f72c61c1c4b06be ]
The pinfunc definitions used GPIO_A as function instead of GPIO_1_0 as
done for all the other pins with GPIO functionality. Fix for consistency.
There are no mainline users that needs adaption.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not convinced it's a good idea to take this patch for stable.
in-tree users are unaffected and the only effect this can have on
out-of-tree users is to break them. So the gain of having this is not
positive.
Am I missing something?
Hm, if those definitions don't have an in-tree users, why are they still
around to begin with?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
