On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:29:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 19:22, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 19:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
>
> <trim>
>
> > My two cents,
> > While running ssuite long running stress testing we have noticed deadlock.
> >
> > > So if you drop that, all works well? I'll go drop that from the queues
> > > now.
> >
> > Let me drop that patch and test it again.
> >
> > Crash log,
> >
> > [ 1957.278399] ============================================
> > [ 1957.283717] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> > [ 1957.289031] 5.13.2-rc1 #1 Not tainted
> > [ 1957.292703] --------------------------------------------
> > [ 1957.298016] kworker/u8:7/236 is trying to acquire lock:
> > [ 1957.303241] ffff8cc203f92c38 (&bfqd->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at:
> > bfq_finish_requeue_request+0x55/0x500 [bfq]
> > [ 1957.312643]
> > [ 1957.312643] but task is already holding lock:
> > [ 1957.318467] ffff8cc203f92c38 (&bfqd->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at:
> > bfq_insert_requests+0x81/0x1750 [bfq]
> > [ 1957.327334]
> > [ 1957.327334] other info that might help us debug this:
> > [ 1957.333852] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > [ 1957.333852]
> > [ 1957.339762] CPU0
> > [ 1957.342206] ----
> > [ 1957.344651] lock(&bfqd->lock);
> > [ 1957.347873] lock(&bfqd->lock);
> > [ 1957.351097]
> > [ 1957.351097] *** DEADLOCK ***
> > [ 1957.351097]
>
> Also noticed on stable-rc 5.12.17-rc1.
I dropped the same patch from there as well already, thanks.
greg k-h
