From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 04587ad9bef6ce9d510325b4ba9852b6129eebdb ] If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the transaction, because we could leave an inode with the improper counts or some other such corruption behind. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 3091540fc22a..3bb8b919d2c1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1050,6 +1050,14 @@ static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(fs_info, node, (ret < 0)); btrfs_release_delayed_inode(node); + /* + * If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the + * transaction, because we could leave the inode with the improper + * counts behind. + */ + if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + return ret; search: -- 2.30.2
