On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 12:47:48PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:27:05PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:12:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > So could you just send a mbox of patches (or tarball), for the 4.19,
> > > > 4.14, and 4.9 trees? That would make it much easier to ensure I got
> > > > them all correct.
> > >
> > > At risk of irritating you, sorry, I am resisting: the more data I send
> > > you, the more likely I am to mess it up in some stupid way. Please ask
> > > again and I shall, but I think your success with 5.12, 5.10, 5.4 just
> > > means that you were right to take a break before 4.19, 4.14, 4.4.
> >
> > I've tried following the instructions for 4.19, and that worked fine on
> > my end too.
> >
> > If no one objects, I can pick up 4.9-4.19 after the current set of
> > kernels is released.
>
> No objection from me, thanks!
>
> greg k-h
Sure, Sasha, whenever suits you: thanks to you both.
I've now checked today's queue/4.19, queue/4.14, queue/4.9:
exactly as intended, thanks.
Thanks for confirming Hugh!
--
Thanks,
Sasha