On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 10:33:29AM +0800, Qiang Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 4:33 AM Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > Commit 1be7107fbe18 ("mm: larger stack guard gap, between vmas") fixed
> > > up almost all architectures to deal with the stack guard gap, but forgit
> > > nds32.
> > >
> > > Resolve this by properly fixing up the nsd32's version of
> > > arch_get_unmapped_area()
> > >
> > > Reported-by: iLifetruth <yixiaonn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Qiang Liu <cyruscyliu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Fixes: 1be7107fbe18 ("mm: larger stack guard gap, between vmas")
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > but it's a bit unfair to say that commit forgot nds32:
> > nds32 came into the tree nearly a year later.
> Could we use "not forward ported to"?
Nah, it was just a mistake in the nds32 implementation when it was
submitted.
thanks,
greg k-h
