On 2021-06-30, kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> kernel/printk/printk.c:2548:6: warning: variable 'next_seq' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] I suppose the correct fix for this warning would be to change the NOP macros. Currently they are: #define prb_read_valid(rb, seq, r) false #define prb_first_valid_seq(rb) 0 They should probably be something like (untested): #define prb_read_valid(rb, seq, r) \ ({ \ (void)(rb); \ (void)(seq); \ (void)(r); \ false; \ }) #define prb_first_valid_seq(rb) \ ({ \ (void)(rb); \ 0; \ }) John Ogness