[PATCH 5.10 020/101] perf/x86/lbr: Remove cpuc->lbr_xsave allocation from atomic context

[Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Like Xu <like.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 488e13a489e9707a7e81e1991fdd1f20c0f04689 ]

If the kernel is compiled with the CONFIG_LOCKDEP option, the conditional
might_sleep_if() deep in kmem_cache_alloc() will generate the following
trace, and potentially cause a deadlock when another LBR event is added:

  [] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:196
  [] Call Trace:
  []  kmem_cache_alloc+0x36/0x250
  []  intel_pmu_lbr_add+0x152/0x170
  []  x86_pmu_add+0x83/0xd0

Make it symmetric with the release_lbr_buffers() call and mirror the
existing DS buffers.

Fixes: c085fb8774 ("perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[peterz: simplified]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210430052247.3079672-2-like.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       |  6 ++++--
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index a88c94d65693..b7f8ed87bfbc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -372,10 +372,12 @@ int x86_reserve_hardware(void)
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&pmc_refcount)) {
 		mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
 		if (atomic_read(&pmc_refcount) == 0) {
-			if (!reserve_pmc_hardware())
+			if (!reserve_pmc_hardware()) {
 				err = -EBUSY;
-			else
+			} else {
 				reserve_ds_buffers();
+				reserve_lbr_buffers();
+			}
 		}
 		if (!err)
 			atomic_inc(&pmc_refcount);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index e2b0efcba101..6c1231837382 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ static inline bool branch_user_callstack(unsigned br_sel)
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache = event->pmu->task_ctx_cache;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
@@ -696,11 +695,6 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_add(struct perf_event *event)
 	perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
 	if (!cpuc->lbr_users++ && !event->total_time_running)
 		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
-
-	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
-	    kmem_cache && !cpuc->lbr_xsave &&
-	    (cpuc->lbr_users != cpuc->lbr_pebs_users))
-		cpuc->lbr_xsave = kmem_cache_alloc(kmem_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
 void release_lbr_buffers(void)
@@ -721,6 +715,26 @@ void release_lbr_buffers(void)
 	}
 }
 
+void reserve_lbr_buffers(void)
+{
+	struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache;
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
+	int cpu;
+
+	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+		return;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		cpuc = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events, cpu);
+		kmem_cache = x86_get_pmu(cpu)->task_ctx_cache;
+		if (!kmem_cache || cpuc->lbr_xsave)
+			continue;
+
+		cpuc->lbr_xsave = kmem_cache_alloc_node(kmem_cache, GFP_KERNEL,
+							cpu_to_node(cpu));
+	}
+}
+
 void intel_pmu_lbr_del(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 6a8edfe59b09..d4f2ea2d9a9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -1122,6 +1122,8 @@ void reserve_ds_buffers(void);
 
 void release_lbr_buffers(void);
 
+void reserve_lbr_buffers(void);
+
 extern struct event_constraint bts_constraint;
 extern struct event_constraint vlbr_constraint;
 
@@ -1267,6 +1269,10 @@ static inline void release_lbr_buffers(void)
 {
 }
 
+static inline void reserve_lbr_buffers(void)
+{
+}
+
 static inline int intel_pmu_init(void)
 {
 	return 0;
-- 
2.30.2