Re: [PATCH] arm64: perf: Disable PMU while processing counter overflows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:57:00AM +0200, Aman Priyadarshi wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 08:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know the content is safe.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 05:51:03 +0100,
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:28:59PM +0200, Aman Priyadarshi wrote:
> > > > From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > [ Upstream commit 3cce50dfec4a5b0414c974190940f47dd32c6dee ]
> > > > 
> > > > The arm64 PMU updates the event counters and reprograms the
> > > > counters in the overflow IRQ handler without disabling the
> > > > PMU. This could potentially cause skews in for group counters,
> > > > where the overflowed counters may potentially loose some event
> > > > counts, while they are reprogrammed. To prevent this, disable
> > > > the PMU while we process the counter overflows and enable it
> > > > right back when we are done.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch also moves the PMU stop/start routines to avoid a
> > > > forward declaration.
> > > > 
> > > > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Aman Priyadarshi <apeureka@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > --
> > > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > What stable tree(s) do you want this applied to?
> > 
> > I guess that'd be 4.14 and previous stables if the patch actually
> > applies.
> > 
> 
> Correct. I have tested the patch on 4.14.y, can confirm that it applies
> cleanly on 4.9.y as well.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux