On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:33:49PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > One should only use st_shndx when >SHN_UNDEF and <SHN_LORESERVE. When > SHN_XINDEX, then use .symtab_shndx. Otherwise use 0. > > This handles the case: st_shndx >= SHN_LORESERVE && st_shndx != SHN_XINDEX. > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YL9HxEc/l0yrl5o8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 4ef57b21d6fb4 ("recordmcount: support >64k sections") > Reported-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> This is apperently causing trouble for Stephen in -next. Please hold.
