On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:16:44PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > On 06/02/2021 11:27 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > With the following patch series, all verifier selftests pass on the archs which > > select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. > > > > [v2,4.19,00/19] bpf: fix verifier selftests, add CVE-2021-29155, CVE-2021-33200 fixes > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20210528103810.22025-1-ovidiu.panait@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > But on inefficient unaligned access architectures, there still exist many failures, > > so some patches about F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS are also needed, backport > > to 4.19 with a minor context difference. > > > > This patch series is based on the series (all now queued up by greg k-h): > > "bpf: fix verifier selftests, add CVE-2021-29155, CVE-2021-33200 fixes". > > > > Björn Töpel (2): > > selftests/bpf: add "any alignment" annotation for some tests > > selftests/bpf: Avoid running unprivileged tests with alignment > > requirements > > > > Daniel Borkmann (2): > > bpf: fix test suite to enable all unpriv program types > > bpf: test make sure to run unpriv test cases in test_verifier > > > > David S. Miller (4): > > bpf: Add BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT. > > bpf: Adjust F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS handling in > > test_verifier.c > > bpf: Make more use of 'any' alignment in test_verifier.c > > bpf: Apply F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to more ACCEPT test > > cases. > > > > Joe Stringer (1): > > selftests/bpf: Generalize dummy program types > > > > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++ > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 +- > > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 + > > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++ > > tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 8 +- > > tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 +- > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 4 +- > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > 8 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) > > > > Hi Greg and Sasha, > > Could you please apply this series to 4.19? Please relax and give us longer than just 2 days to respond :) I'll go review this now... greg k-h
