On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:54:51AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 03:52:29PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 2:14 AM Christian Brauner
> > <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > But the point is that ns->ops should never be accessed when that
> > > namespace type is disabled. Or in other words, the bug is that something
> > > in netns makes use of namespace features when they are disabled. If we
> > > handle ->ops being NULL we might be tapering over a real bug somewhere.
> >
> > It is merely a protocol between fs/nsfs.c and other namespace users,
> > so there is certainly no right or wrong here, the only question is which
> > one is better.
> >
> > >
> > > Jakub's proposal in the other mail makes sense and falls in line with
> > > how the rest of the netns getters are implemented. For example
> > > get_net_ns_fd_fd():
> >
> > It does not make any sense to me. get_net_ns() merely increases
> > the netns refcount, which is certainly fine for init_net too, no matter
> > CONFIG_NET_NS is enabled or disabled. Returning EOPNOTSUPP
> > there is literally saying we do not support increasing init_net refcount,
> > which is of course false.
> >
> > > struct net *get_net_ns_by_fd(int fd)
> > > {
> > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > }
> >
> > There is a huge difference between just increasing netns refcount
> > and retrieving it by fd, right? I have no idea why you bring this up,
> > calling them getters is missing their difference.
>
> This argument doesn't hold up. All netns helpers ultimately increase the
> reference count of the net namespace they find. And if any of them
> perform operations where they are called in environments wherey they
> need CONFIG_NET_NS they handle this case at compile time.
>
> (Pluse they are defined in a central place in net/net_namespace.{c,h}.
> That includes the low-level get_net() function and all the others.
> get_net_ns() is the only one that's defined out of band. So get_net_ns()
> currently is arguably also misplaced.)
>
Ihe get_net_ns() was a static helper function and then sb made it exported
but didn't move it. See commit d8d211a2a0 ('net: Make extern and export get_net_ns()').
> The problem I have with fixing this in nsfs is that it gives the
> impression that this is a bug in nsfs whereas it isn't and it
> potentially helps tapering over other bugs.
>
> get_net_ns() is only called for codepaths that call into nsfs via
> open_related_ns() and it's the only namespace that does this. But
> open_related_ns() is only well defined if CONFIG_<NAMESPACE_TYPE> is
> set. For example, none of the procfs namespace f_ops will be set for
> !CONFIG_NET_NS. So clearly the socket specific getter here is buggy as
> it doesn't account for !CONFIG_NET_NS and it should be fixed.
I agree with Cong that a pure getter returns a generic error is a bit weird.
And get_net_ns() is to get the ns_common which always exists indepent of
CONFIG_NET_NS. For get_net_ns_by_fd(), I think it is a 'findder + getter'.
So maybe we can rollback to patch V1 to fix all code called into
open_related_ns()?
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAM_iQpWwApLVg39rUkyXxnhsiP0SZf=0ft6vsq=VxFtJ2SumAQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -1149,11 +1149,15 @@ static long sock_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg)
mutex_unlock(&vlan_ioctl_mutex);
break;
case SIOCGSKNS:
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
err = -EPERM;
if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
break;
err = open_related_ns(&net->ns, get_net_ns);
+#else
+ err = -ENOTSUPP;
+#endif
>
> Plus your fix leaks references to init netns without fixing get_net_ns()
> too.
> You succeed to increase the refcount of init netns in get_net_ns() but
> then you return in __ns_get_path() because ns->ops aren't set before
> ns->ops->put() can be called. But you also _can't_ call it since it's
> not set because !CONFIG_NET_NS. So everytime you call any of those
> ioctls you increas the refcount of init net ns without decrementing it
> on failure. So the fix is buggy as it is too and would suggest you to
> fixup get_net_ns() too.
Yes, it is a problem. Can be put a BUG_ON() in nsfs so that such bug (calling
into nsfs without ops) can be catched early?
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nsfs.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nsfs.c b/fs/nsfs.c
> index 800c1d0eb0d0..6c055eb7757b 100644
> --- a/fs/nsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nsfs.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ static int __ns_get_path(struct path *path, struct ns_common *ns)
> struct inode *inode;
> unsigned long d;
>
> + /* In case the namespace is not actually enabled. */
> + if (!ns->ops)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> d = atomic_long_read(&ns->stashed);
> if (!d)
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
