Max,
On Sat, May 15 2021 at 00:47, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> I believe the theory was that, while the PIC is advertised in ACPI, it
> might be expected to not be used and only present for some legacy reason
> (therefore untested and buggy). Which I believe led to the question
> whether we shouldn't prefer IOAPIC on systems like that in general. So I
> guess it comes down to how you define "systems like that". By Tomas'
> comment, I guess it should be possible to implement this as "systems
> that should prefer IOAPIC over legacy PIC" quirk.
>
> I guess all modern machines should have an IOAPIC, so it might also be
> preferable to expand that definition, maybe over time and with enough
> testing.
I just double checked and we actually can boot just fine without the
PIC even when it is advertised, but disfunctional.
Can you please add "apic=verbose" to the kernel command line and provide
full dmesg output for a kernel w/o your patch and one with your patch
applied?
Thanks,
tglx
