[PATCH 5.10 122/289] NFSv4.2 fix handling of sr_eof in SEEKs reply

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 73f5c88f521a630ea1628beb9c2d48a2e777a419 ]

Currently the client ignores the value of the sr_eof of the SEEK
operation. According to the spec, if the server didn't find the
requested extent and reached the end of the file, the server
would return sr_eof=true. In case the request for DATA and no
data was found (ie in the middle of the hole), then the lseek
expects that ENXIO would be returned.

Fixes: 1c6dcbe5ceff8 ("NFS: Implement SEEK")
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
index 948a4c69687c..4ebcd9dd1535 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
@@ -665,7 +665,10 @@ static loff_t _nfs42_proc_llseek(struct file *filep,
 	if (status)
 		return status;
 
-	return vfs_setpos(filep, res.sr_offset, inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes);
+	if (whence == SEEK_DATA && res.sr_eof)
+		return -NFS4ERR_NXIO;
+	else
+		return vfs_setpos(filep, res.sr_offset, inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes);
 }
 
 loff_t nfs42_proc_llseek(struct file *filep, loff_t offset, int whence)
-- 
2.30.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux