3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Karl Heiss <kheiss@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 8c2eab9097dba50bcd73ed4632baccc3f34857f9 ]
Don't transition to the PF state on every strike after 'Path.Max.Retrans'.
Per draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-03 Section 5.1.6:
Additional (PMR - PFMR) consecutive timeouts on a PF destination
confirm the path failure, upon which the destination transitions to the
Inactive state. As described in [RFC4960], the sender (i) SHOULD notify
ULP about this state transition, and (ii) transmit heartbeats to the
Inactive destination at a lower frequency as described in Section 8.3 of
[RFC4960].
This also prevents sending SCTP_ADDR_UNREACHABLE to the user as the state
bounces between SCTP_INACTIVE and SCTP_PF for each subsequent strike.
Signed-off-by: Karl Heiss <kheiss@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -496,11 +496,10 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
/* If the transport error count is greater than the pf_retrans
* threshold, and less than pathmaxrtx, and if the current state
- * is not SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, then mark this transport as Partially
- * Failed, see SCTP Quick Failover Draft, section 5.1
+ * is SCTP_ACTIVE, then mark this transport as Partially Failed,
+ * see SCTP Quick Failover Draft, section 5.1
*/
- if ((transport->state != SCTP_PF) &&
- (transport->state != SCTP_UNCONFIRMED) &&
+ if ((transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
(asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
(transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html