From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 92c48950b43f4a767388cf87709d8687151a641f ]
This patch fixes the following message which randomly pops up during
glocktop call:
seq_file: buggy .next function table_seq_next did not update position index
The issue is that seq_read_iter() in fs/seq_file.c also needs an
increment of the index in an non next record case as well which this
patch fixes otherwise seq_read_iter() will print out the above message.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dlm/debug_fs.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
index d6bbccb0ed15..d5bd990bcab8 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
@@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ static void *table_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *iter_ptr, loff_t *pos)
if (bucket >= ls->ls_rsbtbl_size) {
kfree(ri);
+ ++*pos;
return NULL;
}
tree = toss ? &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].toss : &ls->ls_rsbtbl[bucket].keep;
--
2.30.2
