Re: [PATCH 5.12 123/363] watchdog: cleanup handling of false positives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 2021-05-17 15:59:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 9bf3bc949f8aeefeacea4b1198db833b722a8e27 ]
> 
> Commit d6ad3e286d2c ("softlockup: Add sched_clock_tick() to avoid kernel
> warning on kgdb resume") introduced touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync().

[...]

> Make the code more straightforward:
> 
> 1. Always call kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused() at the very
>    beginning to handle PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED. It touches the watchdog
>    when the quest did sleep.
> 
> 2. Handle the situation when the watchdog has been touched
>    (SOFTLOCKUP_DELAY_REPORT is set).
> 
>    Call sched_clock_tick() when touch_*sync() variant was used. It makes
>    sure that the timestamp will be up to date even when it has been
>    touched in atomic context or quest did sleep.
> 
> As a result, kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused() is called on a single
> location.  And the right timestamp is always set when returning from the
> timer callback.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311122130.6788-7-pmladek@xxxxxxxx

Please, remove this patch from the stable backport. It might
cause false softlockup reports, see
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210517140612.222750-1-senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Best Regards,
Petr



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux