[PATCH 5.10 447/530] net/mlx5: Fix bit-wise and with zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 82c3ba31c370b6001cbf90689e98da1fb6f26aef ]

The bit-wise and of the action field with MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_DECRYPT
is incorrect as MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_DECRYPT is zero and not intended
to be a bit-flag. Fix this by using the == operator as was originally
intended.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Fixes: 7dfee4b1d79e ("net/mlx5: IPsec, Refactor SA handle creation and destruction")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/ipsec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/ipsec.c
index cc67366495b0..bed154e9a1ef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/ipsec.c
@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ mlx5_fpga_ipsec_release_sa_ctx(struct mlx5_fpga_ipsec_sa_ctx *sa_ctx)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (sa_ctx->fpga_xfrm->accel_xfrm.attrs.action &
+	if (sa_ctx->fpga_xfrm->accel_xfrm.attrs.action ==
 	    MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_DECRYPT)
 		ida_simple_remove(&fipsec->halloc, sa_ctx->sa_handle);
 
-- 
2.30.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux