On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 12:55 PM Jianwen Ji <jiji@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 6:17 PM Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:22 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:43:50PM -0000, CKI Project wrote: >> > > >> > >Hello, >> > > >> > >We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree: >> > > >> > > Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> > > Commit: beb6df0ce94f - thermal/core/fair share: Lock the thermal zone while looping over instances >> > > >> > >The results of these automated tests are provided below. >> > > >> > > Overall result: FAILED (see details below) >> > > Merge: OK >> > > Compile: OK >> > > Tests: FAILED >> > > >> > >All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here: >> > > >> > > https://arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawarehouse-public/2021/05/11/300944713 >> > > >> > >One or more kernel tests failed: >> > > >> > > s390x: >> > > ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test >> > > >> > > ppc64le: >> > > ❌ LTP >> > > ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test >> > > >> > > aarch64: >> > > ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test >> > > >> > > x86_64: >> > > ❌ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test >> > >> > CKI folks, looks like there was a gap between 5.11.16 and now, and idea >> > if the reported issue here is new in the 5.11.19 -rc, or something that >> > regressed earlier? >> > >> >> Hi Sasha, >> >> this is a bug we've previously reported here: >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210569 > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210569 should have been fixed upstream. > > I think the current bug we have is https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212749. > Thanks for correction Jianwen! The logs look very similar so our result database treated the two issues as the same. According to this BZ comments, it was not yet fixed in mainline, is that correct? Veronika >> >> >> >> This is an older bug we've been seeing for a while and thus the >> report should not have been sent. Apologies for that - we fixed >> some permission issues with reporting yesterday and it must >> have uncovered an underlying bug. This is the only list that hits >> the problem. We'll look into that reason right away. >> >> Veronika >> >> > -- >> > Thanks, >> > Sasha >> > >> > > > -- > > Jianwen Ji > > He/Him > > Quality Engineering > > Red Hat Beijing > > T: +86-10-62608073
