Hi! > pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed. > Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here. > Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage > counter balanced. I believe we need to enforce "patches need to be tested" rule at least against robots. Code was correct in 3/4 instances, this introduces bugs. Yes, last one needs fixing. Best regards, Pavel > +++ b/drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32-hash.c > @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static void stm32_hash_finish_req(struct ahash_request *req, int err) > static int stm32_hash_hw_init(struct stm32_hash_dev *hdev, > struct stm32_hash_request_ctx *rctx) > { > - pm_runtime_get_sync(hdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(hdev->dev); > > if (!(HASH_FLAGS_INIT & hdev->flags)) { > stm32_hash_write(hdev, HASH_CR, HASH_CR_INIT); > @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ static int stm32_hash_export(struct ahash_request *req, void *out) > u32 *preg; > unsigned int i; > > - pm_runtime_get_sync(hdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(hdev->dev); > > while ((stm32_hash_read(hdev, HASH_SR) & HASH_SR_BUSY)) > cpu_relax(); > @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static int stm32_hash_import(struct ahash_request *req, const void *in) > > preg = rctx->hw_context; > > - pm_runtime_get_sync(hdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(hdev->dev); > > stm32_hash_write(hdev, HASH_IMR, *preg++); > stm32_hash_write(hdev, HASH_STR, *preg++); -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature