On Mon, 10 May 2021 09:32:54 +0100, "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 5/10/2021 3:09 PM, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > > > > On 5/10/2021 12:34 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> 在 2021/5/10 上午11:00, Zhu, Lingshan 写道: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 5/10/2021 10:43 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > >>>> > >>>> 在 2021/5/8 下午3:11, Zhu Lingshan 写道: > >>>>> This reverts commit a979a6aa009f3c99689432e0cdb5402a4463fb88. > >>>>> > >>>>> The reverted commit may cause VM freeze on arm64 platform. > >>>>> Because on arm64 platform, stop a consumer will suspend the VM, > >>>>> the VM will freeze without a start consumer > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Please resubmit with the formal process of stable > >>>> (stable-kernel-rules.rst). > >>> sure, I will re-submit it to stable kernel once it is merged into > >>> Linus tree. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >> > >> > >> I think it's better to resubmit (option 1), see how > >> stable-kernel-rules.rst said: > >> > >> "" > >> > >> :ref:`option_1` is **strongly** preferred, is the easiest and most > >> common. > >> :ref:`option_2` and :ref:`option_3` are more useful if the patch > >> isn't deemed > >> worthy at the time it is applied to a public git tree (for > >> instance, because > >> it deserves more regression testing first). > >> > >> """ > >> > >> Thanks > > OK, works for me, I will add cc stable, and resubmit it soon > > > > Thanks! > I just seeMarc has already added "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", and > he would take the patch in his tree, so I think no need to resend. That's fine, I can fix things up myself and queue the fix for -rc2. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
