Yet another way to mark upstream commits was Re: [PATCH 5.10 13/29] swiotlb: add a IO_TLB_SIZE define

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> From: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> commit: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff

This is 5th variant of marking upstream commits, and I need to update
my scripts again.

Could we please put this into Signed-off area, where it belongs, so it
is easy to see who touched the patch for mainline, and stop this
creativity?

> Add a new IO_TLB_SIZE define instead open coding it using
> IO_TLB_SHIFT all over.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'd like to see

Upstream: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff

here. Probably. Note that it has additional advantage that you can
easily marked who Acked/Tested the patch for mainline, and who tested
it in the stable context.

> Signed-off-by: Jianxiong Gao <jxgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux