Patch "xen/spinlock: Don't enable them unconditionally." has been added to the 3.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    xen/spinlock: Don't enable them unconditionally.

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     xen-spinlock-don-t-enable-them-unconditionally.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From e0fc17a936334c08b2729fff87168c03fdecf5b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:48:04 -0400
Subject: xen/spinlock: Don't enable them unconditionally.

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit e0fc17a936334c08b2729fff87168c03fdecf5b6 upstream.

The git commit a945928ea2709bc0e8e8165d33aed855a0110279
('xen: Do not enable spinlocks before jump_label_init() has executed')
was added to deal with the jump machinery. Earlier the code
that turned on the jump label was only called by Xen specific
functions. But now that it had been moved to the initcall machinery
it gets called on Xen, KVM, and baremetal - ouch!. And the detection
machinery to only call it on Xen wasn't remembered in the heat
of merge window excitement.

This means that the slowpath is enabled on baremetal while it should
not be.

Reported-by: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks disabled\n");
 		return;
 	}
-
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n");
 	pv_lock_ops.lock_spinning = PV_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_lock_spinning);
 	pv_lock_ops.unlock_kick = xen_unlock_kick;
 }
@@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static __init int xen_init_spinlocks_jum
 	if (!xen_pvspin)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (!xen_domain())
+		return 0;
+
 	static_key_slow_inc(&paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled);
 	return 0;
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-3.14/xen-spinlock-don-t-enable-them-unconditionally.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]