On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 04:44:45PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2021/4/26 13:39, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 10:39:29PM -0400, He Ying wrote:
> > > hulk inclusion
> > > category: bugfix
> > > bugzilla: NA
> > > DTS: NA
> > > CVE: NA
> > >
> > > --------------------------------
> > >
> > > We triggered the following error while running our 4.19 kernel
> > > with the pseudo-NMI patches backported to it:
> > >
> > > [ 14.816231] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 14.816231] kernel BUG at irq.c:99!
> > > [ 14.816232] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > > [ 14.816232] Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____))
> > > [ 14.816233] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G O 4.19.95.aarch64 #14
> > > [ 14.816233] Hardware name: evb (DT)
> > > [ 14.816234] pstate: 80400085 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO)
> > > [ 14.816234] pc : asm_nmi_enter+0x94/0x98
> > > [ 14.816235] lr : asm_nmi_enter+0x18/0x98
> > > [ 14.816235] sp : ffff000008003c50
> > > [ 14.816235] pmr_save: 00000070
> > > [ 14.816237] x29: ffff000008003c50 x28: ffff0000095f56c0
> > > [ 14.816238] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffff000008004000
> > > [ 14.816239] x25: 00000000015e0000 x24: ffff8008fb916000
> > > [ 14.816240] x23: 0000000020400005 x22: ffff0000080817cc
> > > [ 14.816241] x21: ffff000008003da0 x20: 0000000000000060
> > > [ 14.816242] x19: 00000000000003ff x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > > [ 14.816243] x17: 0000000000000008 x16: 003d090000000000
> > > [ 14.816244] x15: ffff0000095ea6c8 x14: ffff8008fff5ab40
> > > [ 14.816244] x13: ffff8008fff58b9d x12: 0000000000000000
> > > [ 14.816245] x11: ffff000008c8a200 x10: 000000008e31fca5
> > > [ 14.816246] x9 : ffff000008c8a208 x8 : 000000000000000f
> > > [ 14.816247] x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : ffff8008fff58b9e
> > > [ 14.816248] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000080000000
> > > [ 14.816249] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000080000000
> > > [ 14.816250] x1 : 0000000000120000 x0 : ffff0000095f56c0
> > > [ 14.816251] Call trace:
> > > [ 14.816251] asm_nmi_enter+0x94/0x98
> > > [ 14.816251] el1_irq+0x8c/0x180 (IRQ C)
> > > [ 14.816252] gic_handle_irq+0xbc/0x2e4
> > > [ 14.816252] el1_irq+0xcc/0x180 (IRQ B)
> > > [ 14.816253] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x58
> > > [ 14.816253] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x240
> > > [ 14.816253] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50
> > > [ 14.816254] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
> > > [ 14.816254] gic_handle_irq+0xf8/0x2e4
> > > [ 14.816255] el1_irq+0xcc/0x180 (IRQ A)
> > > [ 14.816255] arch_cpu_idle+0x34/0x1c8
> > > [ 14.816255] default_idle_call+0x24/0x44
> > > [ 14.816256] do_idle+0x1d0/0x2c8
> > > [ 14.816256] cpu_startup_entry+0x28/0x30
> > > [ 14.816256] rest_init+0xb8/0xc8
> > > [ 14.816257] start_kernel+0x4c8/0x4f4
> > > [ 14.816257] Code: 940587f1 d5384100 b9401001 36a7fd01 (d4210000)
> > > [ 14.816258] Modules linked in: start_dp(O) smeth(O)
> > > [ 15.103092] ---[ end trace 701753956cb14aa8 ]---
> > > [ 15.103093] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> > > [ 15.103099] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> > > [ 15.103100] Kernel Offset: disabled
> > > [ 15.103100] CPU features: 0x36,a2400218
> > > [ 15.103100] Memory Limit: none
> > >
> > > which is cause by a 'BUG_ON(in_nmi())' in nmi_enter().
> > >
> > > >From the call trace, we can find three interrupts (noted A, B, C above):
> > > interrupt (A) is preempted by (B), which is further interrupted by (C).
> > >
> > > Subsequent investigations show that (B) results in nmi_enter() being
> > > called, but that it actually is a spurious interrupt. Furthermore,
> > > interrupts are reenabled in the context of (B), and (C) fires with
> > > NMI priority. We end-up with a nested NMI situation, something
> > > we definitely do not want to (and cannot) handle.
> > >
> > > The bug here is that spurious interrupts should never result in any
> > > state change, and we should just return to the interrupted context.
> > > Moving the handling of spurious interrupts as early as possible in
> > > the GICv3 handler fixes this issue.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3f1f3234bc2d ("irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking before calling IRQ handler")
> >
> > This commit is in 5.1, not 4.19.
> >
> > How are you hitting this?
> >
> > What are we supposed to do wit this patch?
> >
> > confused,
>
> Sorry for the noise, we have an internally used kernel which is based
> on LTS 4.19 kernel, and we backported some mainline features including
> the pseudo NMI for ARM64, that's why we backporting the following
> bugfixes as well.
>
> I didn't notice it was cced stable and Marc as well, and adding
> my review tag (for internally review process), sorry.
Not a problem, thanks for letting us know.
greg k-h
