Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 19/04/21 2:06 pm, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> kexec_file_load uses initial_boot_params in setting up the device-tree
>> for the kernel to be loaded. Though initial_boot_params holds info
>> about CPUs at the time of boot, it doesn't account for hot added CPUs.
>>
>> So, kexec'ing with kexec_file_load syscall would leave the kexec'ed
>> kernel with inaccurate CPU info. Also, if kdump kernel is loaded with
>> kexec_file_load syscall and the system crashes on a hot added CPU,
>> capture kernel hangs failing to identify the boot CPU.
>>
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash
>> CPU: 24 PID: 6065 Comm: echo Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5upstream #54
>> Call Trace:
>> [c0000000e590fac0] [c0000000007b2400] dump_stack+0xc4/0x114 (unreliable)
>> [c0000000e590fb00] [c000000000145290] panic+0x16c/0x41c
>> [c0000000e590fba0] [c0000000008892e0] sysrq_handle_crash+0x30/0x40
>> [c0000000e590fc00] [c000000000889cdc] __handle_sysrq+0xcc/0x1f0
>> [c0000000e590fca0] [c00000000088a538] write_sysrq_trigger+0xd8/0x178
>> [c0000000e590fce0] [c0000000005e9b7c] proc_reg_write+0x10c/0x1b0
>> [c0000000e590fd10] [c0000000004f26d0] vfs_write+0xf0/0x330
>> [c0000000e590fd60] [c0000000004f2aec] ksys_write+0x7c/0x140
>> [c0000000e590fdb0] [c000000000031ee0] system_call_exception+0x150/0x290
>> [c0000000e590fe10] [c00000000000ca5c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278
>> --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7fff905b9664
>> NIP: 00007fff905b9664 LR: 00007fff905320c4 CTR: 0000000000000000
>> REGS: c0000000e590fe80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.12.0-rc5upstream)
>> MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000242
>> XER: 00000000
>> IRQMASK: 0
>> GPR00: 0000000000000004 00007ffff5fedf30 00007fff906a7300 0000000000000001
>> GPR04: 000001002a7355b0 0000000000000002 0000000000000001 00007ffff5fef616
>> GPR08: 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fff9073a160 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> GPR20: 0000000000000000 00007fff906a4ee0 0000000000000002 0000000000000001
>> GPR24: 00007fff906a0898 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 000001002a7355b0
>> GPR28: 0000000000000002 00007fff906a1790 000001002a7355b0 0000000000000002
>> NIP [00007fff905b9664] 0x7fff905b9664
>> LR [00007fff905320c4] 0x7fff905320c4
>> --- interrupt: c00
>>
>> To avoid this from happening, extract current CPU info from of_root
>> device node and use it for setting up the fdt in kexec_file_load case.
>>
>> Fixes: 6ecd0163d360 ("powerpc/kexec_file: Add appropriate regions for memory reserve map")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
>>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v1 -> v3
>> - https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2021-April/227756.html
>>
>> v3 -> v4
>> - Rearranged if-else statement in update_cpus_node function to avoid
>> redundant checks for positive cpus_offset.
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
>> index 02b9e4d0dc40..195ef303d530 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
>> @@ -960,6 +960,99 @@ unsigned int kexec_fdt_totalsize_ppc64(struct kimage *image)
>> return fdt_size;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * add_node_prop - Read property from device node structure and add
>> + * them to fdt.
>> + * @fdt: Flattened device tree of the kernel
>> + * @node_offset: offset of the node to add a property at
>> + * np: device node pointer
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
>> + */
>> +static int add_node_prop(void *fdt, int node_offset, const struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + struct property *pp;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + if (!np)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
>> + for (pp = np->properties; pp; pp = pp->next) {
>> + ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, node_offset, pp->name,
>> + pp->value, pp->length);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("Unable to add %s property: %s\n",
>> + pp->name, fdt_strerror(ret));
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +out:
>> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * update_cpus_node - Update cpus node of flattened device-tree using of_root
>> + * device node.
>> + * @fdt: Flattened device tree of the kernel.
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
>> + */
>> +static int update_cpus_node(void *fdt)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *cpus_node, *dn;
>> + int cpus_offset, cpus_subnode_off, ret = 0;
>> +
>> + cpus_offset = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/cpus");
>> + if (cpus_offset < 0 && cpus_offset != -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND) {
>> + pr_err("Malformed device tree: error reading /cpus node: %s\n",
>> + fdt_strerror(cpus_offset));
>> + return cpus_offset;
>> + } else {
>
>
>> + if (cpus_offset > 0) {
>> + ret = fdt_del_node(fdt, cpus_offset);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("Error deleting /cpus node: %s\n",
>> + fdt_strerror(ret));
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add cpus node to fdt */
>> + cpus_offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/"),
>> + "cpus");
>> + if (cpus_offset < 0) {
>> + pr_err("Error creating /cpus node: %s\n",
>> + fdt_strerror(cpus_offset));
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add cpus node properties */
>> + cpus_node = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
>> + ret = add_node_prop(fdt, cpus_offset, cpus_node);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Loop through all subnodes of cpus and add them to fdt */
>> + for_each_node_by_type(dn, "cpu") {
>> + cpus_subnode_off = fdt_add_subnode(fdt,
>> + cpus_offset,
>> + dn->full_name);
>> + if (cpus_subnode_off < 0) {
>> + pr_err("Unable to add %s subnode: %s\n",
>> + dn->full_name, fdt_strerror(cpus_subnode_off));
>> + return cpus_subnode_off;
>> + }
>> + ret = add_node_prop(fdt, cpus_subnode_off, dn);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> The above code block doesn't really need an explicit else condition..
Yeah, use the early return to avoid having to indent all the rest of
that logic.
Please send a v5.
cheers
