On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:09:10PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 3:26 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy > <ilya.lipnitskiy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > [<vendor>,]nr-gpios property is used by some GPIO drivers[0] to indicate > > the number of GPIOs present on a system, not define a GPIO. nr-gpios is > > not configured by #gpio-cells and can't be parsed along with other > > "*-gpios" properties. > > > > nr-gpios without the "<vendor>," prefix is not allowed by the DT > > spec[1], so only add exception for the ",nr-gpios" suffix and let the > > error message continue being printed for non-compliant implementations. > > > > [0]: nr-gpios is referenced in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio: > > - gpio-adnp.txt > > - gpio-xgene-sb.txt > > - gpio-xlp.txt > > - snps,dw-apb-gpio.yaml > > > > [1]: > > Link: https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/cb53a16a1eb3e2169ce170c071e47940845ec26e/schemas/gpio/gpio-consumer.yaml#L20 > > > > Fixes errors such as: > > OF: /palmbus@300000/gpio@600: could not find phandle > > > > Fixes: 7f00be96f125 ("of: property: Add device link support for interrupt-parent, dmas and -gpio(s)") > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.5.x > > --- > > drivers/of/property.c | 11 ++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c > > index 2046ae311322..1793303e84ac 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/property.c > > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c > > @@ -1281,7 +1281,16 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl7, "pinctrl-7", NULL) > > DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl8, "pinctrl-8", NULL) > > DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(regulators, "-supply", NULL) > > DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells") > > -DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpios, "-gpios", "#gpio-cells") > > + > > +static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np, > > + const char *prop_name, int index) > > +{ > > + if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios")) > > + return NULL; > > Ah I somehow missed this patch. This gives a blanked exception for > vendor,nr-gpios. I'd prefer explicit exceptions for all the instances > of ",nr-gpios" we are grandfathering in. Any future additions should > be rejected. Can we do that please? > > Rob, you okay with making this list more explicit? Not the kernel's job IMO. A schema is the right way to handle that. Rob
