[PATCH 5.10 020/126] kernel: freezer should treat PF_IO_WORKER like PF_KTHREAD for freezing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 15b2219facadec583c24523eed40fa45865f859f ]

Don't send fake signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads, they don't accept
signals. Just treat them like kthreads in this regard, all they need
is a wakeup as no forced kernel/user transition is needed.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/freezer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
index dc520f01f99d..1a2d57d1327c 100644
--- a/kernel/freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/freezer.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ bool freeze_task(struct task_struct *p)
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+	if (!(p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IO_WORKER)))
 		fake_signal_wake_up(p);
 	else
 		wake_up_state(p, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-- 
2.30.1






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux