From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 5de2055d31ea88fd9ae9709ac95c372a505a60fa ] The use_ww_ctx flag is passed to mutex_optimistic_spin(), but the function doesn't use it. The frequent use of the (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) combination is repetitive. In fact, ww_ctx should not be used at all if !use_ww_ctx. Simplify ww_mutex code by dropping use_ww_ctx from mutex_optimistic_spin() an clear ww_ctx if !use_ww_ctx. In this way, we can replace (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) by just (ww_ctx). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316153119.13802-2-longman@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 3f8a35104285..b3da782cdfbd 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) */ static __always_inline bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - const bool use_ww_ctx, struct mutex_waiter *waiter) + struct mutex_waiter *waiter) { if (!waiter) { /* @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ fail: #else static __always_inline bool mutex_optimistic_spin(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, - const bool use_ww_ctx, struct mutex_waiter *waiter) + struct mutex_waiter *waiter) { return false; } @@ -905,10 +905,13 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, struct ww_mutex *ww; int ret; + if (!use_ww_ctx) + ww_ctx = NULL; + might_sleep(); ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base); - if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) { + if (ww_ctx) { if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx))) return -EALREADY; @@ -925,10 +928,10 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip); if (__mutex_trylock(lock) || - mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, NULL)) { + mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, NULL)) { /* got the lock, yay! */ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip); - if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) + if (ww_ctx) ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(ww, ww_ctx); preempt_enable(); return 0; @@ -939,7 +942,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * After waiting to acquire the wait_lock, try again. */ if (__mutex_trylock(lock)) { - if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) + if (ww_ctx) __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock, ww_ctx); goto skip_wait; @@ -992,7 +995,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, goto err; } - if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) { + if (ww_ctx) { ret = __ww_mutex_check_kill(lock, &waiter, ww_ctx); if (ret) goto err; @@ -1005,7 +1008,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * ww_mutex needs to always recheck its position since its waiter * list is not FIFO ordered. */ - if ((use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) || !first) { + if (ww_ctx || !first) { first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter); if (first) __mutex_set_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF); @@ -1018,7 +1021,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * or we must see its unlock and acquire. */ if (__mutex_trylock(lock) || - (first && mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, &waiter))) + (first && mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, &waiter))) break; spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -1027,7 +1030,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, acquired: __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) { + if (ww_ctx) { /* * Wound-Wait; we stole the lock (!first_waiter), check the * waiters as anyone might want to wound us. @@ -1047,7 +1050,7 @@ skip_wait: /* got the lock - cleanup and rejoice! */ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip); - if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) + if (ww_ctx) ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx); spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); -- 2.30.1
