On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:46:40 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch fixes a lockdep splat introduced by commit f21916ec4826
> ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM pointer invalidated").
> The lockdep splat only occurs when starting a Secure Execution guest.
> Crypto virtualization (vfio_ap) is not yet supported for SE guests;
> however, in order to avoid this problem when support becomes available,
> this fix is being provided.
>
> The circular locking dependency was introduced when the setting of the
> masks in the guest's APCB was executed while holding the matrix_dev->lock.
> While the lock is definitely needed to protect the setting/unsetting of the
> matrix_mdev->kvm pointer, it is not necessarily critical for setting the
> masks; so, the matrix_dev->lock will be released while the masks are being
> set or cleared.
>
> Keep in mind, however, that another process that takes the matrix_dev->lock
> can get control while the masks in the guest's APCB are being set or
> cleared as a result of the driver being notified that the KVM pointer
> has been set or unset. This could result in invalid access to the
> matrix_mdev->kvm pointer by the intervening process. To avoid this
> scenario, two new fields are being added to the ap_matrix_mdev struct:
>
> struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> ...
> bool kvm_busy;
> wait_queue_head_t wait_for_kvm;
> ...
> };
>
> The functions that handle notification that the KVM pointer value has
> been set or cleared will set the kvm_busy flag to true until they are done
> processing at which time they will set it to false and wake up the tasks on
> the matrix_mdev->wait_for_kvm wait queue. Functions that require
> access to matrix_mdev->kvm will sleep on the wait queue until they are
> awakened at which time they can safely access the matrix_mdev->kvm
> field.
>
> Fixes: f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM pointer invalidated")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I intend to give a couple of work-days to others, and if nobody objects
merge this. (I will wait till Tuesday.)
I've tested it and it does silence the lockdep splat.
Regards,
Halil
