From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 0031275d119efe16711cd93519b595e6f9b4b330 ] Without that it's not safe to use them in a linked combination with others. Now combinations like IORING_OP_SENDMSG followed by IORING_OP_SPLICE should be possible. We already handle short reads and writes for the following opcodes: - IORING_OP_READV - IORING_OP_READ_FIXED - IORING_OP_READ - IORING_OP_WRITEV - IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED - IORING_OP_WRITE - IORING_OP_SPLICE - IORING_OP_TEE Now we have it for these as well: - IORING_OP_SENDMSG - IORING_OP_SEND - IORING_OP_RECVMSG - IORING_OP_RECV For IORING_OP_RECVMSG we also check for the MSG_TRUNC and MSG_CTRUNC flags in order to call req_set_fail_links(). There might be applications arround depending on the behavior that even short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() retuns continue an IOSQE_IO_LINK chain. It's very unlikely that such applications pass in MSG_WAITALL, which is only defined in 'man 2 recvmsg', but not in 'man 2 sendmsg'. It's expected that the low level sock_sendmsg() call just ignores MSG_WAITALL, as MSG_ZEROCOPY is also ignored without explicitly set SO_ZEROCOPY. We also expect the caller to know about the implicit truncation to MAX_RW_COUNT, which we don't detect. cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c4e1a4cc0d905314f4d5dc567e65a7b09621aab3.1615908477.git.metze@xxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/io_uring.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 4ac24e75ae63..c06237c87527 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -4625,6 +4625,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct io_async_msghdr iomsg, *kmsg; struct socket *sock; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4651,6 +4652,9 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter); + ret = __sys_sendmsg_sock(sock, &kmsg->msg, flags); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) return io_setup_async_msg(req, kmsg); @@ -4660,7 +4664,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov) kfree(kmsg->iov); req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP; - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, 0, cs); return 0; @@ -4674,6 +4678,7 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct iovec iov; struct socket *sock; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4695,6 +4700,9 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&msg.msg_iter); + msg.msg_flags = flags; ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) @@ -4702,7 +4710,7 @@ static int io_send(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS) ret = -EINTR; - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, 0, cs); return 0; @@ -4854,6 +4862,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct socket *sock; struct io_buffer *kbuf; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret, cflags = 0; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4889,6 +4898,9 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&kmsg->msg.msg_iter); + ret = __sys_recvmsg_sock(sock, &kmsg->msg, req->sr_msg.umsg, kmsg->uaddr, flags); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) @@ -4901,7 +4913,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov) kfree(kmsg->iov); req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP; - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret || ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (kmsg->msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC)))) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, cflags, cs); return 0; @@ -4917,6 +4929,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, struct socket *sock; struct iovec iov; unsigned flags; + int min_ret = 0; int ret, cflags = 0; sock = sock_from_file(req->file); @@ -4947,6 +4960,9 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, else if (force_nonblock) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; + if (flags & MSG_WAITALL) + min_ret = iov_iter_count(&msg.msg_iter); + ret = sock_recvmsg(sock, &msg, flags); if (force_nonblock && ret == -EAGAIN) return -EAGAIN; @@ -4955,7 +4971,7 @@ static int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock, out_free: if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED) cflags = io_put_recv_kbuf(req); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < min_ret || ((flags & MSG_WAITALL) && (msg.msg_flags & (MSG_TRUNC | MSG_CTRUNC)))) req_set_fail_links(req); __io_req_complete(req, ret, cflags, cs); return 0; -- 2.30.1
