Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/kvm: VSIE: fix MVPG handling for prefixing and MSO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23.03.21 16:16, Christian Borntraeger wrote:


On 23.03.21 16:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 23.03.21 16:07, Christian Borntraeger wrote:


On 22.03.21 15:05, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Prefixing needs to be applied to the guest real address to translate it
into a guest absolute address.

The value of MSO needs to be added to a guest-absolute address in order to
obtain the host-virtual.

Fixes: 223ea46de9e79 ("s390/kvm: VSIE: correctly handle MVPG when in VSIE")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
    arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 6 +++++-
    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 48aab6290a77..ac86f11e46dc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static u64 vsie_get_register(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page,
    static int vsie_handle_mvpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
    {
        struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb_s = &vsie_page->scb_s;
-    unsigned long pei_dest, pei_src, src, dest, mask;
+    unsigned long pei_dest, pei_src, dest, src, mask, mso, prefix;
        u64 *pei_block = &vsie_page->scb_o->mcic;
        int edat, rc_dest, rc_src;
        union ctlreg0 cr0;
@@ -1010,9 +1010,13 @@ static int vsie_handle_mvpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
        cr0.val = vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0];
        edat = cr0.edat && test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 8);
        mask = _kvm_s390_logical_to_effective(&scb_s->gpsw, PAGE_MASK);
+    mso = scb_s->mso & ~(1UL << 20);
             shouldnt that be ~((1UL << 20 ) -1)


Looking at shadow_scb(), we can simply take scb_s->mso unmodified.

Right, I think I can fix this up (and get rid of the local mso variable)
when queueing. Or shall Claudio send a new version of the patch?


IMHO, you can just fix it up.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux