On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:12:31AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:08:49AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:07:39PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:28:56AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > My mistake, meant to lop those last two commits off of 4.19.y, they > > > > were the ones I referred to earlier working their way through the ARM > > > > maintainers tree. Regenerated the series' (rather than edit the patch > > > > files) additionally with --base=auto. Re-attached. > > > > > > Queued up, thanks! > > > > This series seems to cause build breakages in a lot of places, so I'm > > going to drop the whole set of them now: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/be846d89-ab5a-f02a-c05e-1cd40acc5baa@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > and: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/066efc42-0788-8668-2ff5-d431e77068b5@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Nick, if you want these merged, can you fix up the errors and resend? > > > > Perhaps you might want to run these through the tuxbuild tool before > > sending? You should have access to it... > > Oops, wait, they are fine for 5.10.y, just 4.19 and 5.4 are broken, will > go drop those patches only. Also, these are a lot of churn for 5.4 and 4.19, I'm not convinced it's really needed there. Why again is this required? thanks, greg k-h
