Re: commit <sha> upstream. vs git cherry-pick -x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:37:03PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
Hello stable maintainers,
While working on some backports I'm about to send hopefully today or
tomorrow, I was curious why the convention seems to be for folks to
use "commit <sha> upstream." in commit messages?  I know that's what's
in https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-3,
but I was curious whether the format from `git cherry-pick -xs <sha>`
is not acceptable? I assume there's context as to why not?  It is nice
to have that info uniformly near the top, but I find myself having to
cherry-pick then amend a lot.  Or is there an option in git to
automate the stable kernel's preferred style?

AFAIK it's just due to historical reasons. Both the stable tree and git
added this "feature" at about the same time, each doing it slightly
differently.

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux