Re: [PATCH stable-5.11 0/9] stable-5.11 backports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:30:36AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> 5-6/9 were forgotten to be marked for-stable. Others are
> 5 out of 6 failed to apply + dependencies.
> 
> Jens Axboe (3):
>   fs: provide locked helper variant of close_fd_get_file()
>   io_uring: get rid of intermediate IORING_OP_CLOSE stage
>   io_uring/io-wq: kill off now unused IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (6):
>   io_uring: fix inconsistent lock state
>   io_uring: deduplicate core cancellations sequence
>   io_uring: unpark SQPOLL thread for cancelation
>   io_uring: deduplicate failing task_work_add
>   io_uring/io-wq: return 2-step work swap scheme
>   io_uring: don't take uring_lock during iowq cancel

Thanks for these, now queued up.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux