From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 95c85fba1f64c3249c67f0078a29f8a125078189 upstream.
It's wrong calling btrfs_put_block_group in
__btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space if the block group passed is
different than the block group the cluster represents. As this means the
cluster doesn't have a reference to the passed block group. This results
in double put and a use-after-free bug.
Fix this by simply bailing if the block group we passed in does not
match the block group on the cluster.
Fixes: fa9c0d795f7b ("Btrfs: rework allocation clustering")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -2714,8 +2714,10 @@ static void __btrfs_return_cluster_to_fr
struct rb_node *node;
spin_lock(&cluster->lock);
- if (cluster->block_group != block_group)
- goto out;
+ if (cluster->block_group != block_group) {
+ spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
+ return;
+ }
cluster->block_group = NULL;
cluster->window_start = 0;
@@ -2753,8 +2755,6 @@ static void __btrfs_return_cluster_to_fr
entry->offset, &entry->offset_index, bitmap);
}
cluster->root = RB_ROOT;
-
-out:
spin_unlock(&cluster->lock);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
