On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 04:00:40PM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote: > Dear Greg, > > Would you consider KASan for ARM patches for LTS (5.10) kernel? Those > are 7a1be318f579..421015713b30 if I understand correctly. They are > not normal stable material, but I think they will help tremendously in > discovering kernel bugs on 32-bit ARMs. Looks like a new feature to me, right? How many patches, and have you tested them? If so, submit them as a patch series and we can review them, but if this is a new feature, it does not meet the stable kernel rules. And why not just use 5.11 or newer for discovering kernel bugs? Why does 5.10 matter here? thanks, greg k-h
