Re: [PATCH 4.9.y 1/3] dm table: fix iterate_devices based device capability checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 02:46:23PM +0800, Jeffle Xu wrote:
> commit a4c8dd9c2d0987cf542a2a0c42684c9c6d78a04e upstream.
> 
> According to the definition of dm_iterate_devices_fn:
>  * This function must iterate through each section of device used by the
>  * target until it encounters a non-zero return code, which it then returns.
>  * Returns zero if no callout returned non-zero.
> 
> For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may
> iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero
> return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration
> in advance. No iterate_devices_callout_fn should return non-zero unless
> device iteration should stop.
> 
> Rename dm_table_requires_stable_pages() to dm_table_any_dev_attr() and
> elevate it for reuse to stop iterating (and return non-zero) on the
> first device that causes iterate_devices_callout_fn to return non-zero.
> Use dm_table_any_dev_attr() to properly iterate through devices.
> 
> Rename device_is_nonrot() to device_is_rotational() and invert logic
> accordingly to fix improper disposition.
> 
> Fixes: c3c4555edd10 ("dm table: clear add_random unless all devices have it set")
> Fixes: 4693c9668fdc ("dm table: propagate non rotational flag")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> [jeffle: no stable writes]
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-table.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> index 5d120c3cee57..ba56be34cd5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> @@ -1306,6 +1306,46 @@ struct dm_target *dm_table_find_target(struct dm_table *t, sector_t sector)
>  	return &t->targets[(KEYS_PER_NODE * n) + k];
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * type->iterate_devices() should be called when the sanity check needs to
> + * iterate and check all underlying data devices. iterate_devices() will
> + * iterate all underlying data devices until it encounters a non-zero return
> + * code, returned by whether the input iterate_devices_callout_fn, or
> + * iterate_devices() itself internally.
> + *
> + * For some target type (e.g. dm-stripe), one call of iterate_devices() may
> + * iterate multiple underlying devices internally, in which case a non-zero
> + * return code returned by iterate_devices_callout_fn will stop the iteration
> + * in advance.
> + *
> + * Cases requiring _any_ underlying device supporting some kind of attribute,
> + * should use the iteration structure like dm_table_any_dev_attr(), or call
> + * it directly. @func should handle semantics of positive examples, e.g.
> + * capable of something.
> + *
> + * Cases requiring _all_ underlying devices supporting some kind of attribute,
> + * should use the iteration structure like dm_table_supports_nowait() or
> + * dm_table_supports_discards(). Or introduce dm_table_all_devs_attr() that
> + * uses an @anti_func that handle semantics of counter examples, e.g. not
> + * capable of something. So: return !dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, anti_func);
> + */
> +static bool dm_table_any_dev_attr(struct dm_table *t,
> +				  iterate_devices_callout_fn func)
> +{
> +	struct dm_target *ti;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dm_table_get_num_targets(t); i++) {
> +		ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i);
> +
> +		if (ti->type->iterate_devices &&
> +		    ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, func, NULL))
> +			return true;
> +        }
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int count_device(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>  			sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
>  {
> @@ -1476,12 +1516,12 @@ static bool dm_table_discard_zeroes_data(struct dm_table *t)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static int device_is_nonrot(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> -			    sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> +static int device_is_rotational(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> +				sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(dev->bdev);
>  
> -	return q && blk_queue_nonrot(q);
> +	return q && !blk_queue_nonrot(q);
>  }
>  
>  static int device_is_not_random(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> @@ -1500,23 +1540,6 @@ static int queue_supports_sg_merge(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>  	return q && !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE, &q->queue_flags);
>  }
>  
> -static bool dm_table_all_devices_attribute(struct dm_table *t,
> -					   iterate_devices_callout_fn func)
> -{
> -	struct dm_target *ti;
> -	unsigned i = 0;
> -
> -	while (i < dm_table_get_num_targets(t)) {
> -		ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i++);
> -
> -		if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
> -		    !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, func, NULL))
> -			return false;
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
>  static int device_not_write_same_capable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>  					 sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
>  {
> @@ -1607,10 +1630,10 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
>  		q->limits.discard_zeroes_data = 0;
>  
>  	/* Ensure that all underlying devices are non-rotational. */
> -	if (dm_table_all_devices_attribute(t, device_is_nonrot))
> -		queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
> -	else
> +	if (dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, device_is_rotational))
>  		queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
> +	else
> +		queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q);
>  
>  	if (!dm_table_supports_write_same(t))
>  		q->limits.max_write_same_sectors = 0;
> @@ -1628,7 +1651,7 @@ void dm_table_set_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q,
>  	 * Clear QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if any underlying device does not
>  	 * have it set.
>  	 */
> -	if (blk_queue_add_random(q) && dm_table_all_devices_attribute(t, device_is_not_random))
> +	if (blk_queue_add_random(q) && dm_table_any_dev_attr(t, device_is_not_random))
>  		queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM, q);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

This patch breaks the build :(

Please always test-build your patches.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux