On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 05:28:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/28/21 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:29:07PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There is a regression in Linux 5.10.9 that does not happen in 5.10.8. It is still there as > >> of 5.11.1 > > > > Is this the same issue reported here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/f1070486-891a-8ec0-0390-b9aeb03178ce@xxxxxxxxxx > > ? > > > > If so, is this a problem in 5.11 as well? > > I see in the original email: > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/3423617.kz1aARBMGD@archlinux/ > > That Diego is using the iGPU part of a Haswell CPU, so yes this is almost > certainly the same issue. > > Diego as I already mentioned to another arch user, it would be good if the > arch kernel-maintainers can pick-up these 3 commits from the drm-intel tree > as downstream patches for now: > > e627d5923cae ("drm/i915/gt: One more flush for Baytrail clear residuals") > d30bbd62b1bf ("drm/i915/gt: Flush before changing register state") > 1914911f4aa0 ("drm/i915/gt: Correct surface base address for renderclear") > > We (Fedora) have added these as downstream patches for now and we have > multiple reports that these resolve the problem. > > Chris, can you please send the 2nd and 3th commit of the above list on > their way to Linus ASAP, so that Greg can add them to the stable series? > > ATM only the 1st commit is in Linus tree (unless the others have landed > with different hashes?) I have queued the first one up now, thanks. greg k-h
