On 26.02.21 15:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 26/02/21 13:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> So can you please add this patch to the stable trees that backported the >>>> problematic upstream commit 6441fa6178f5456d1d4b512c08798888f99db185 ? >>>> >>>> If I should submit this in any other way just ask, was not sure about >>>> what works best with a patch which cannot be cherry-picked cleanly. >>> >>> Ok, I'll submit it. >>> >>> Thanks for the testing. >> >> Does that mean I should not take the patch here in this email and that >> you will submit it after some timeperiod, or that I should take this >> patch as-is? > > The patch that Thomas requested (commit 841c2be09fe) does not apply cleanly, so I'll take care of sending the backport. > Note that the patch I added inline in my initial mail here was already adapted to apply cleanly, at least on stable-5.4.y May not have made that clear enough, so mentioning it here - ignore me this message if that was read and thought of. cheers, Thomas
