On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:32:07PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> + stable ML
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 21:26, Daniel Thompson
> <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:46:52PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Currently breakpoints in kernel .init.text section are not handled
> > > correctly while allowing to remove them even after corresponding pages
> > > have been freed.
> > >
> > > Fix it via killing .init.text section breakpoints just prior to initmem
> > > pages being freed.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I saw Andrew has picked this one up. That's ok for me:
> > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I already enriched kgdbtest to cover this (and they pass) so I guess
> > this is also:
> > Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> Thanks Daniel.
>
> > BTW this is not Cc:ed to stable and I do wonder if it crosses the
> > threshold to be considered a fix rather than a feature. Normally I
> > consider adding safety rails for kgdb to be a new feature but, in this
> > case, the problem would easily ensnare an inexperienced developer who is
> > doing nothing more than debugging their own driver (assuming they
> > correctly marked their probe function as .init) so I think this weighs
> > in favour of being a fix.
> >
>
> Makes sense, Cc:ed stable.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
