From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit e19eb11f4f3d3b0463cd897016064a79cb6d8c6d ] I've been running a stress test that runs 20 workers in their own subvolume, which are running an fsstress instance with 4 threads per worker, which is 80 total fsstress threads. In addition to this I'm running balance in the background as well as creating and deleting snapshots. This test takes around 12 hours to run normally, going slower and slower as the test goes on. The reason for this is because fsstress is running fsync sometimes, and because we're messing with block groups we often fall through to btrfs_commit_transaction, so will often have 20-30 threads all calling btrfs_commit_transaction at the same time. These all get stuck contending on the extent tree while they try to run delayed refs during the initial part of the commit. This is suboptimal, really because the extent tree is a single point of failure we only want one thread acting on that tree at once to reduce lock contention. Fix this by making the flushing mechanism a bit operation, to make it easy to use test_and_set_bit() in order to make sure only one task does this initial flush. Once we're into the transaction commit we only have one thread doing delayed ref running, it's just this initial pre-flush that is problematic. With this patch my stress test takes around 90 minutes to run, instead of 12 hours. The memory barrier is not necessary for the flushing bit as it's ordered, unlike plain int. The transaction state accessed in btrfs_should_end_transaction could be affected by that too as it's not always used under transaction lock. Upon Nikolay's analysis in [1] it's not necessary: In should_end_transaction it's read without holding any locks. (U) It's modified in btrfs_cleanup_transaction without holding the fs_info->trans_lock (U), but the STATE_ERROR flag is going to be set. set in cleanup_transaction under fs_info->trans_lock (L) set in btrfs_commit_trans to COMMIT_START under fs_info->trans_lock.(L) set in btrfs_commit_trans to COMMIT_DOING under fs_info->trans_lock.(L) set in btrfs_commit_trans to COMMIT_UNBLOCK under fs_info->trans_lock.(L) set in btrfs_commit_trans to COMMIT_COMPLETED without locks but at this point the transaction is finished and fs_info->running_trans is NULL (U but irrelevant). So by the looks of it we can have a concurrent READ race with a WRITE, due to reads not taking a lock. In this case what we want to ensure is we either see new or old state. I consulted with Will Deacon and he said that in such a case we'd want to annotate the accesses to ->state with (READ|WRITE)_ONCE so as to avoid a theoretical tear, in this case I don't think this could happen but I imagine at some point KCSAN would flag such an access as racy (which it is). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/e1fd5cc1-0f28-f670-69f4-e9958b4964e6@xxxxxxxx Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ add comments regarding memory barrier ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h | 12 ++++++------ fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h index 1c977e6d45dc3..52364ea322d67 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_data_ref { u64 offset; }; +enum btrfs_delayed_ref_flags { + /* Indicate that we are flushing delayed refs for the commit */ + BTRFS_DELAYED_REFS_FLUSHING, +}; + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root { /* head ref rbtree */ struct rb_root_cached href_root; @@ -158,12 +163,7 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_ref_root { u64 pending_csums; - /* - * set when the tree is flushing before a transaction commit, - * used by the throttling code to decide if new updates need - * to be run right away - */ - int flushing; + unsigned long flags; u64 run_delayed_start; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index fbf93067642ac..3cced84752178 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -909,9 +909,8 @@ bool btrfs_should_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) { struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction; - smp_mb(); if (cur_trans->state >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START || - cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing) + test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_REFS_FLUSHING, &cur_trans->delayed_refs.flags)) return true; return should_end_transaction(trans); @@ -2043,23 +2042,22 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) btrfs_trans_release_metadata(trans); trans->block_rsv = NULL; - /* make a pass through all the delayed refs we have so far - * any runnings procs may add more while we are here - */ - ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); - if (ret) { - btrfs_end_transaction(trans); - return ret; - } - - cur_trans = trans->transaction; - /* - * set the flushing flag so procs in this transaction have to - * start sending their work down. + * We only want one transaction commit doing the flushing so we do not + * waste a bunch of time on lock contention on the extent root node. */ - cur_trans->delayed_refs.flushing = 1; - smp_wmb(); + if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_REFS_FLUSHING, + &cur_trans->delayed_refs.flags)) { + /* + * Make a pass through all the delayed refs we have so far. + * Any running threads may add more while we are here. + */ + ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0); + if (ret) { + btrfs_end_transaction(trans); + return ret; + } + } btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans); -- 2.27.0
