Re: "blktrace: fix accounting ..." breaks lttng API in -stable trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 13:30 -0400, gregkh wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:07:33AM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > Dirk Behme points out that this "Cc: stable" commit breaks the
> > lttng-modules userspace API when applied to stable kernels.  Stable
> > versions 3.2, 3.8, 3.11, and 3.13 (at least) have all queued it:
> > 
> >         af5040da01ef980670b3741b3e10733ee3e33566
> >         blktrace: fix accounting of partially completed requests
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 10:28 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> > > [...] might break the build of the user space lttng-modules
> > > (lttng-probe-block.c) due the the API change of
> > > trace_block_rq_complete().
> > 
> > > [...] On the other hand, looking into the lttng-modules git
> > > http://git.lttng.org/?p=lttng-modules.git;a=commitdiff;h=1c53e689434a6bdd7dc3f54c07bfb72750d1d24c
> > > looks like this is the necessary user space adaption to the kernel 
> > > change? So this looks like that lttng-modules expects a KERNEL_VERSION
> > > >= (3,15,0) to have this commit?
> > 
> > 
> > My inclination is that we probably need to revert/drop "af5040d
> > blktrace: fix accounting..." from the stable kernels to unbreak the
> > userspace API.
> 
> Then you will run into this issue with 3.15, when it is released.

No, I think "#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3,15,0))" in the
lttng-modules commit referenced above guards against that.  Apparently,
lttng-modules expects to see the new API in >= 3.15 and the old API in
the stable kernels.


>   So
> might as well be consistant here.
> 
> Are tracepoints, and the data within them, being considered as a "user
> api" that we can never change / break anymore?  As the current
> implementation is obviously broken (see the patch for details), why
> would it make sense to even keep it around in that state?  lttng, by
> using that existing api, is reporting incorrect data, wouldn't it make
> more sense to fix it up too?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Mathieu Desnoyers (author of the lttng-modules patch), can you shed any
more light on this topic?

Thanks,

 -Kamal


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]